Subsea Technology as a Solution for Sustainable Utilization of Marine Resources
Keywords:
Subsea Technology, Marine Resources, Sustainable Development, Marine Environment, Offshore EnergyAbstract
The sea has great potential as a source of energy, food, minerals, and space for infrastructure development. However, the use of marine resources often poses environmental, safety, and social problems, especially when exploration activities are carried out without adequate supervision. Subsea technology offers an approach that allows underwater activities to be carried out in a safer, more efficient, and controlled manner. This technology includes underwater production systems, monitoring sensors, underwater vehicles, inspection robots, communication networks, and renewable energy and carbon storage supporting infrastructure. This perspective article discusses the role of subsea technology in supporting the sustainable use of marine resources, while reviewing the limitations of the approaches that have been used. The discussion shows that subsea technology does not automatically create sustainability. The benefits are highly dependent on governance, data quality, human resource readiness, community involvement, and consistency of environmental monitoring. The authors argue that the development of subsea technology needs to be directed from an exploitation-centric approach to one that integrates industrial efficiency, ecosystem protection, safety, and community interests. With such a framework, subsea technology can be an important part of responsible marine development.
References
[1] L. Hanim and Noorman, “UTILIZATION OF INDONESIA MARINE RESOURCES IN AN EFFORT TO REALIZE INDONESIA TOWARDS THE SHAFT OF THE MARITIME WORLD,” 2017, [Online]. Available: https://consensus.app/papers/utilization-of-indonesia-marine-resources-in-an-effort-to-hanim-noorman/3279af1343c4584491dce23efb02fedc/
[2] F. Du, C. Li, and W.-W. Wang, “Development of Subsea Pipeline Buckling, Corrosion and Leakage Monitoring,” J. Mar. Sci. Eng., 2023, doi: 10.3390/jmse11010188.
[3] A. Bidgoli et al., “Towards autonomous subsea processing: A review of integrated production systems, modeling, and multiobjective optimization,” Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 2026, doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2026.117071.
[4] S. Adumene, R. Islam, I. Dick, E. Zarei, M. Inegiyemiema, and M. Yang, “Influence-Based Consequence Assessment of Subsea Pipeline Failure under Stochastic Degradation,” Energies, 2022, doi: 10.3390/en15207460.
[5] M. Ho, S. El-Borgi, D. Patil, and G. Song, “Inspection and monitoring systems subsea pipelines: A review paper,” Struct. Heal. Monit., vol. 19, pp. 606–645, 2020, doi: 10.1177/1475921719837718.
[6] G. C. Mwakinpunda et al., “Carbon dioxide (CO2) storage in geological formations: Overview of mechanisms, storage media, leakage risk, and monitoring techniques,” Pet. Res., 2026, doi: 10.1016/j.ptlrs.2026.03.007.
[7] D. D. Jambol, “Technological innovations and optimized work methods in subsea maintenance and production,” Eng. Sci. Technol. J., 2024, doi: 10.51594/estj.v5i5.1112.
[8] B. Jiang, J. Feng, X.-R. Cui, J. Wang, Y. Liu, and H. Song, “Security and Reliability of Internet of Underwater Things: Architecture, Challenges, and Opportunities,” ACM Comput. Surv., vol. 57, pp. 1–37, 2024, doi: 10.1145/3700640.
[9] H. Brandt and R. Eriksen, “RAM Analysis for Deepwater Subsea Developments,” 2001, doi: 10.4043/13003-ms.
[10] J. Lonsdale, “From compliance to foresight: modernising marine environmental impact assessment.,” Integr. Environ. Assess. Manag., vol. 22 4, pp. 971–973, 2026, doi: 10.1093/inteam/vjaf173.
[11] G. Yousof, Z. Mohsen, V. Majid, and G. Yasser, “A Comprehensive Review of Maintenance Strategies: From Reactive to Proactive Approaches,” Cent. ASIA CAUCASUS, 2025, doi: 10.61841/ca-c.70-83.
[12] F. Nauert and P. Kampmann, “Inspection and maintenance of industrial infrastructure with autonomous underwater robots,” Front. Robot. AI, vol. 10, 2023, doi: 10.3389/frobt.2023.1240276.
[13] J. Lateef and X. Yu, “A systematic review of digital twins for civil infrastructure inspection,” J. Build. Pathol. Rehabil., vol. 11, 2026, doi: 10.1007/s41024-026-00894-8.
[14] C.-T. Gao et al., “Life Cycle Structural Integrity Design Approach for the Components of Subsea Production System: SCSSV as a Case Study,” IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatronics, vol. 29, pp. 2768–2778, 2024, doi: 10.1109/tmech.2023.3329831.
[15] H. Mohammed, M. Burai, and R. Ibrahim, “Sustainable Smart Facility: A Real‐Time Internet of Things‐Based Environmental Monitoring and Predictive Control System Using Amazon Web Services Cloud Services,” IET Wirel. Sens. Syst., 2026, doi: 10.1049/wss2.70035.
[16] I. Lawrence et al., “How Brazil’s Innovation Ecosystem Accelerates Subsea Cycle Time Through R&D&I Fostering Instruments and Policies: Lessons Learned and Opportunities,” in Offshore Technology Conference, 2026. doi: 10.4043/37123-ms.
[17] M. Wilke, “Comparing Public Participation in Coastal and Marine Planning in the Arctic: Lessons from Iceland and Norway,” Coasts, 2023, doi: 10.3390/coasts3040021.
[18] K. Kaulicke, L. Cremades, and S. L. Gracia, “Culturally Grounded Co-Design for Sustainable Technology: A Conceptual Analysis Illustrated by the O-Waste Project in the Gambia,” World, 2026, doi: 10.3390/world7070107.
